美国一位教授在学生作业中发现了一篇几乎完美的论文,好到远远超出他对学生的预期。于是,教授拿着这篇论文去问人工智能工具,果然验证了自己的怀疑……
据《商业内幕》网报道,美国北密歇根大学宗教研究和哲学教授安东尼·奥曼( )发现有两名学生提交了写的论文。
, a and at , told he had two by the AI .
奥曼教授在接受CGTN采访时讲道,“这篇文章写得比我的大多数学生都要好,语法太完美,结构太合理(too sound),观点太前卫(too ),好到不符合我对学生的预期,这亮起了红灯(red flag)。”
“The red flag was that the essay was than most of my can write. The was too , the was too sound, and the ideas were kind of too for what I would from my .” said in an .
为了验证自己的怀疑,他把学生的论文输入到里问,“这是你写的吗?”而答道:“99.9%的概率是的。”
“So, what I did was, I took that essay and it to , and I asked it, ‘Hey, did you write this?’ It that there was a 99.9 that it did.”
此外,美国弗曼大学哲学系教授达伦·希克( Hick)同样发现,一名学生交了一篇人工智能生成的论文。
A few weeks after the of , Hick, a at , said he a in an AI- essay.
希克教授表示,当他发现这篇论文里有一些写得很好的错误信息(well- )时,他就开始怀疑了。在使用检测器后,结果显示,这篇文章有99%的可能性是人工智能生成的。
Hick said he grew when the in an on-topic essay that some well- .After it Open AI’s , the said it was 99% the essay had been AI-.
这两位教授都表示,在他们与学生对峙后,学生们都承认了违规行为。最终,希克教授的学生考试不及格,奥曼教授则让他的学生重写论文。
Both Hick and said they their , all of whom to the . Hick’s the class and had his the from .
奥曼教授表示,“我希望学生们真正学到知识,而他们能做到这一点的唯一方法就是真正由自己完成作业。”
“I want the to learn the , and the only way they can do that is by the ,” said.
《商业内幕网》报道:两名教授表示发现学生使用在论文中作弊,他们解释了为什么人工智能抄袭很难被证明。
不仅仅是大学教授在为等人工智能聊天机器人的崛起而困扰。据《纽约时报》报道,由于几乎所有能上网的人都能使用这些人工智能工具,美国各地的教育部门都在调整工作流程,重新设计整个课程,迫使学生提交手写论文或引入口试(oral exams)。
It’s not just with the rise of AI like . As a of these tools to much with an , the are and , to the NYT, to or oral exams.
此外,纽约市和西雅图的公立学校已经完全禁止在他们自己的网络和设备上使用。
The New York City and have on own and .
CGTN视频截图
对此,奥曼教授表示,他认为“禁令背后的情绪是合理的”。“学校希望确保学生学习和拥有批判性思维( ),这是学习写作的一部分。”
“I think the the ban is ,” said. “They want to make sure that their are the that are part of how to write.”
然而,大学不太可能效仿。毕竟,学生绕开这些限制是非常容易的。即使是那些旨在帮助教师发现学生偷偷使用等人工智能工具的检测工具,也可能没有多大用处。
But aren’t to suit. After all, these is easy. Even tools to in use of AI tools like will be of use.
“学生可以修改生成的几个单词,加入一些语法错误,检测工具就发现不了这是聊天机器人写的了。” 奥曼教授表示,“这些检测工具也会随着时间的推移而改进吗?会。但可能还不足以跟上人工智能聊天机器人本身的发展速度。”
” can a few words from what , some , and the no think it’s by a ,” said. “Will these also with time? Yes. But not to keep pace with the of the .”
CGTN视频截图
奥曼教授还认为,随着的发布,木已成舟(the cat is out of the bag),所以在课堂上与对抗是毫无意义的。
, the cat is out of the bag — so it’d be to fight in the , the .
就算学校禁止使用,“学生们一毕业就可以使用它,”他说。“此外,学生们本来就在哀叹‘现实生活’和‘学术’之间存在巨大鸿沟。因此,在我看来,忽视或只是试图阻止它的使用是一个巨大的错误,”教授总结道。
” will have to it the they ,” he said. “Plus, that there is a big gulf ‘real life’ and ‘.'” “So, or just to its use is a big , in my mind,” .
对奥曼教授来说,他已经决定调整自己的论文写作课程,要求学生在课堂上用正在被实时监控( )的电脑来写作初稿。他还计划鼓励他的哲学系学生“像对待其他哲学资源一样对待”,这意味着他们将被要求评估其论据和论点( and )。
For his part, has to his own essay , and will to be in the on that are being .He’s on his to “react to in the same way they would any other ,” that they will be asked to its and .
综合来源:商业内幕网,CGTN ,网,纽约时报,央视网
China Daily精读计划来了!
每天20分钟,
带你学英语,看世界!
发表回复